Yeah. It did look really good. But, to be honest, I was slightly relieved when he said it was taken. I've not got any transport at the mo', having sold my previous motor to get the pennies to go Land Cruiser hunting. So I'd have had to get the train down from Manchester to Slough to see it, which would have been about £200 return [or £120 if I wanted to be optimistic and just buy a single]. And I'd have been gutted to have forked out that amount of cash to go and see something and it turn out not to be as good as it looked in the photos.
I must say though that the advent of the intarwebs [sites like eBay and Gumtree] and the DVLA's 'Check MOT History' feature are a real godsend when it comes to vehicle hunting these days. I'm old enough to remember the days when hunting for a new motor meant getting hold of a copy of AutoTrader, going through pages of small ads, circling likely candidates and then spending a day ringing round trying to arrange viewings. And then --as now-- half the time what you went to see bore no relation to how it was described in the ad.
But at least now, we can ask to see photos of things like the underside and the 'Check MOT History' is brilliant for exposing bullshit such as "Maintained regardless of cost" when you can see that some £5 part has showed up as an advisory on about half a dozen previous MOTs and obviously never been attended to... or "Brilliant rust free example" when the MOT history is littered with advisories for "Underbody corrosion".
One advert I saw bragged about how the Land Cruiser in question had "Sailed through its MOT". When I checked the history, it had failed miserably a couple of weeks previously, and then passed a week later but still with a list of advisories as long as your arm. Methinks the vendor confused the words "sailing" and "scraping"!