Tony Heller (aka Steven Goddard) is not a real climate expert, he has degrees in electrical engineering and geology. Worth a look:
https://climatefeedback.org/claimre...manipulating-data-tony-heller-steven-goddard/
IMO, Tony Heller does not profess to be a Climate Scientist as such, he specializes in data reliance, the checking of origin, the use and processing of data, and in so doing he has found anomalies duly recognized as such by the original authors, yet never corrected.
For a report issued by the UN IPCC which concludes such alarming predictions, it is inconceivable to me that the governments involved make no effort to check the basis of such conclusions, instead relying on so-called peer review carried out by the same groups of scientists that authored the reports, paid for by the same funding.
This is not peer review in any sense of the meaning, and the evidence of tampering to match the agenda of the UN is overwhelming.
I ask what objection can be raised against checking something that has such dire effects on our lives in the developed world and such a devastating effect on the developing nations, effectively preventing them from emerging from poverty and all the human misery that stems from it?
The science is not settled, that’s a fact, until all these anomalies that exist in the report have been thoroughly debated, corrected, and all concerned are satisfied that it is adequate for the courses of action that will follow.
Any other approach has to be gross negligent misconduct, whatever the result.
Tony Heller is not funded by any government or anyone with a vested interest, the authors of the report were and are. Many of them that at the time scientifically concluded anything that contradicted the UN’s agenda, were cut from the funding.
Whole papers have ‘disappeared’ as a consequence, such as the late Keith Briffa an eminent British scientist who concluded something very different from the IPCC report.
I don’t want to debate this on an individual basis, everyone with an opinion should do their own research to verify their take on this. But I would encourage everyone to do this, it’s too important either way to just assume that the UN knows best.
In my view, the whole thing stinks.
Another good channel on youtoob... (there’s dozens of them raising good issues, and they’re increasing, so I’m not alone in my concerns).
Cheers Higgy...
