The FJ Cruiser was originally a design concept vehicle paying homage to the FJ40 but the reaction of potential owners at the 2003 New York Auto Show persuaded Toyota to produce it in relatively small numbers. In North America it is classed as a 'mid' sized vehicle, although it is small in comparison with Tacomas, Rams,etc. The 'TRD' version/s are the most sought after but all of them seem to keep their value.
Personally I liked the fact that Toyota recognised their history and produced the FJ and it is far better looking than that new 'X' thing they showed recently as a concept 4x4.
If I were ever to replace my 40 with a Toyota manufactured in the 2000s - no contest it would be an FJ Cruiser. (BTW this will never happen!)
My son, who has been in Canada for 11 years, has been a Jeep guy but after years of bad experiences with them, last year bought a 4Runner, only because he couldn't find an FJ at the right money. The 4Runner is better, more reliable than the Jeep, but it isn't an FJ Cruiser.
Although I appreciate that the modern models are very capable, to me the FJ always looked like it could 'do the job' even though it was Prado based. I am not being detrimental to Prado but they have always been produced as 'lightweight' whereas 40,70,80 & 105 were produced as 'heavyweight'.
Regards,
Rodger