Rob Cowell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2011
- Messages
- 1,677
- Country Flag
It was on that page if you scroll down you will see,
under
What percentage of London is white?
At the 2011 census London had a population of 8,173,941. Of this number, 44.9% were White British. 37% of the population were born outside the UK, including 24.5% born outside of Europe.
Those figures are from 2011, but I wouldn't think they've changed a great deal since then (except got larger).
I really don't have a problem with that, I'm just trying to point out the effect they have on our resources.
And yes Rob, I am UK born and bred.
London is not a country. Those figures do not prove your assertion that we are a minority in our own country. Because we are not.
More people = more resources. All the figures I have seen show immigrants as net contributors. So if there is a shortfall in funding either non-immigrants are the ones over consuming resources, or the collection and allocation of resources is being badly managed (not just by the current government, but by their predecessors). I believe it is predominantly the latter. That wouldn't improve if you removed immigrants, in fact the figures suggest it would get worse.
You have observed two things. Poorer health provision. And increased immigration. But correlation is not causality. Spending per person on health care in the UK has increased slightly in the last few years [1], so we know resources have grown faster than the population. The more people = less to go round argument is easy to disprove.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_health_expenditure_per_capita