Don't like the adverts?  Click here to remove them

P reg 80 series

Sure i have seen that before :think: was it the one being sold from a hidden location with no keys or something like that ?

If its the same one it was talked about on here i remember saying it looks like its been repossessed .
 
Not dear if the mileage is correct, I've gotta say though I'd expect the seat and steering wheel to be in better condition for that mileage. That said show me a better one for the money.
Just to note, its not one of the "last" incarnation as it doesn't have the passenger air bag, roof rails or the "best" gearbox.
 
that does look familiar, unless that ugly bonnet decoration was a popular thing in the 90's
 
Mileage seem correct according to MOT Historyand also seems to back up that the truck was off the road for 6 years (2010-2016).

Proof is in the pudding though, so really need to view it I suppose.



  • Vehicle makeTOYOTA
  • Vehicle modelLANDCRUISER
  • Date first used9 January 1997
  • Fuel typeDiesel
  • ColourGrey


[h=2]MOT history of this vehicle[/h]
  • Test date12 April 2016
  • Expiry date11 April 2017
  • Test ResultPass
  • Odometer reading116,419 miles
  • MOT test number4631 9049 3869
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    rear suspension arm bushes, slightly perished with a small amount of movement
    brake pipes beginning to show signs of light corrosion
    all prescribed areas and chassis beginning to show signs of corrosion
    slight play in steering and suspension
    o/s/r and n/s/f tyres wearing on edges
    welding repairs to vehicle chassis and prescribed areas done ok

  • Test date12 April 2016
  • Test ResultFail
  • Odometer reading116,419 miles
  • MOT test number7259 8220 0515
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Brakes imbalanced across an axle fronts 29% (3.7.B.5b)
    nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)

  • Advisory notice item(s)
    rear suspension arm bushes, slightly perished with a small amount of movement
    brake pipes beginning to show signs of light corrosion
    all prescribed areas and chassis beginning to show signs of corrosion
    slight play in steering and suspension
    o/s/r and n/s/f tyres wearing on edges
    welding repairs to vehicle chassis and prescribed areas done ok

  • Test date11 December 2009
  • Expiry date10 December 2010
  • Test ResultPass
  • Odometer reading116,167 miles
  • MOT test number7725 2584 9351
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
    Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)

  • Test date10 December 2008
  • Expiry date10 December 2009
  • Test ResultPass
  • Odometer reading115,788 miles
  • MOT test number6019 7504 8390
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
    Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
    Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)

  • Test date5 December 2008
  • Test ResultFail
  • Odometer reading115,755 miles
  • MOT test number9024 1084 8329
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
    Nearside Stop lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.2.1f)
    Offside Stop lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.2.1f)
    Nearside Rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.3.2f)
    Offside Rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.3.2f)
    Nearside Rear Direction indicator incomplete (1.5.A1b)
    Centre Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
    Front Windscreen has damage to the swept area in excess of a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)

  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
    Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
    Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
    Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)

  • Test date11 December 2007
  • Expiry date10 December 2008
  • Test ResultPass
  • Odometer reading112,387 miles
  • MOT test number5202 9504 7307
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Centre Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)

  • Test date27 November 2007
  • Test ResultFail
  • Odometer reading112,387 miles
  • MOT test number4432 8133 7407
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Nearside Front position lamp(s) not in good working order (function impaired) (1.1.4a)
    Nearside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
    Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)

  • Advisory notice item(s)
    stone chips to both headlamps

  • Test date2 November 2006
  • Expiry date1 November 2007
  • Test ResultPass
  • Odometer reading108,000 miles
  • MOT test number1802 1620 6389
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Offside Front Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
    Hand brake raises very high needs adjusting
    Washers weak to drivers side

  • Test date19 October 2005
  • Expiry date18 October 2006
  • Test ResultPass
  • Odometer reading101,118 miles
  • MOT test number3725 2289 5238

 
that does look familiar, unless that ugly bonnet decoration was a popular thing in the 90's

I also remember thinking a good body with bumper scratches suggests to me it is a more honest ad than many out there that have been dressed up for sale with rattlecans and an intense valet .
 
Don't like the adverts?  Click here to remove them
Wasent that bonnet piece an import thing?
 
I always thought the hood ornament was an aftermarket addition ?
 
I always thought the hood ornament was an aftermarket addition ?

Deffo. Not one on my 81 import and wouldn't have bought it if there had been!![emoji13]
 
Good God you're right!! I've even found another one on EBay with one!!
http://r.ebay.com/7mw3I

I don't know why but aside from vintage cars and of course RR (no, not Them but Rolls Royce), I have always had a revulsion for such things. It just doesn't look right IMHO.
 
All the Middle East models have them for some reason.

Even had one on my Pajero... cough!
 
seems odd Clive putting a Toyota badge on a mitsi :)
 
IMG_1478.JPG

a few years ago we found this incredibly rare Jagcedes, or is it a mercuar ?
 
as we are still on the subject of badging..i photo'd this RR in Kuala Lumpur. :shifty:
IMG_20130928_001851.jpg
 
I had the leaping cat mascot on my old XJ12 back in the early 80's. It was from a MK2 3.8 saloon and I was told then that it should be fixed on with soft shear bolts that would easily break in case you hit a pedestrian? I decided to use standard bolts instead and loctited them which was fine until some t**t tried to nick it and only succeeded in making a mess of the bonnet! A good reason not to fit one these days I reckon.
 
Back
Top