For my money where the Colorado gains over other very similar products - Mistsi, Troop etc is in the quality of it's 4 wheel drive mechanism and drive train. No need for FWH or electronic front prop clutches etc. it is a proper system beautifully mated. Motorway or field, it's in 4 wheel all the time. It may have a sunroof or plastic arches and be seen parked outside the primary school at 15.00 hrs but it's a proper 4x4. And the rear locker as standard is a monster bonus
But we're into thread drift again. Not that it matters. I don't think that the question was about which Landcruiser is the best. That's a stupid question. They are all Landcruisers. It was about the changing balance of the forum. Possibly a pointless point in the first place but we all like a good discussion.
I recall the early Lincombs where Simon and I were in SWBs, Grenade used to poll up in his Prado shortie and Steve was (still is) in his black LWB. Now, Colorados just about out number the 80 brigade. Who cares. It's great to see them and it gives us some thing to practice recovery on ...
As an aside, every single obstacle that has beaten an 80 has beaten a 90 too. Therefore they must be equal. Hmm, not sure that works.
My main point, Chris, wasn't what LC is best (80, obviously) - but in response to the original post - i,e, that what we're seeing here is simply a common symptom as enthusiast clubs and groups run over time - it happened with Landrover, and its starting to happen with Cruisers. I remember many years ago when I was a member of the MG Owners Club with a 73 RWA Midget, the first rebadged MG Metros and Maestros started to appear...

I guess my main point is, when does badge engineering and capitalising on a known and respected name, take over from genuine evolution of a vehicle? Aston Martin Cygnet anyone? Try rocking up to an Aston owners club in that one...
