Great thread this, read it cover to cover. As others have said, I need a 4x4 but do get a bit tired of people saying "why do you want economy when you got a 4x4?". The only reply I can give to explain my point, and it usually does, is.... "if you were offered an Amazon VX with every possible extra which did 100mpg, would you like it more than yours doing 20mph?" If yes, you get my point. If no, you are a billionaire and not an ideal candidate for a sensible combination about economy of anything!
I am in the market for an Amazon and really stuck on which one to choose. After years of auto cars, I wanted a manual (i love driving). I got a manual Volvo XC90 and what a pile of poo it is, as was the one before (which was returned due to ECU damage from water ingress "because someone didn't clean the windscreen gutter" (cheers Volvo!).
Anyways.... I do get the lovely comfort of an auto and enjoyed it a lot when I had it, but having read this old thread (and sorry if nobody wanted it reviving!) I am wondering if I should consider a manual in an Amazon?
I basically want the best fuel economy I can get, ACCEPTING that it will be somewhere between awful and dire whatever I do

. My XC90 does 27. The closer I can get to that the less earache I will get off the misses, so I don't apologise for choosing an Amazon VX model based on MPG. Some people seem to say their 80 is better than the 100, others say the 100 is better than the 80, others say the manual is better than auto. from my research it sounds to me like the 24v (which I think means the later 100s) is 'usually' better on fuel than the 80. Does anyone know about the auto/manual issue though? Because I have read forums where people say the auto is better than the manual so I am a bit confused but this seems like the authority on LCs so here I am, to see if anyone has some experienced views on this! Thanks